Assess the editorial record
We review the article, its context and the specific statements you dispute. Useful evidence might establish a factual error, an important subsequent development or a privacy concern; disagreement with an article is not itself a reason for removal.
Engage with publishers responsibly
Where appropriate, we help prepare factual correspondence seeking a correction, update or review. Matters requiring legal advice should involve a qualified adviser. A publisher may retain legitimate reporting, and we do not control its editorial decision.
What an engagement can include
We begin with a confidential discussion of your concerns and the information already available in public. The assessment defines priorities, identifies the actions within our remit and records any dependency on publishers, platforms or specialist legal advice.
Your proposed scope sets out the work, communications and reporting approach before you decide whether to proceed. Where a third party controls the outcome, we explain the uncertainty rather than offering an unconditional promise.
Reviewing progress honestly
We review agreed actions against the initial assessment and document meaningful changes. A correction, a de-indexing decision, an improved profile and a response to a review are different outcomes; each should be reported accurately, without implying that a platform or publisher is under our control.
Your questions
Can you guarantee the outcome?
No universal outcome is guaranteed. Decisions by publishers and platforms depend on their rules, the facts and applicable law. Any specific contractual undertaking must be confirmed in your written agreement.
How do we get started?
Tell us the name or organisation concerned, the main issue and your objectives. Avoid sending highly sensitive documents through an initial public enquiry. We can discuss a suitable next step privately.